Why is there Carbon 14 in Dinosaur bones? Is it possible that it is background Carbon 14, or is it a contaminate? This article deals in depth with claims of certain creationist researchers that C14 was found in dinosaur bones. Good article, which points out the sad negative effect that such willful misrepresention has on the gospel message. Also, just to be clear, there are no dinosaur bones, only dinosaur fossils, where the original biological carbon has been replaced by minerals, except perhaps in rare cases where trace amounts of collagen may persist. Carbon may also be present through contamination, and through naturally occurring biofilms. Also, at the lower limits of detection, I understand that residual carbon in the testing equipment makes for noise which limits dating.
The age of fossils can be determined using stratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and radiocarbon dating. Paleontology seeks to map out how life evolved across geologic time. A substantial hurdle is the difficulty of working out fossil ages. There are several different methods for estimating the ages of fossils, including:. Paleontologists rely on stratigraphy to date fossils.
Bone, Carbon, Dating Fossil, Dinosaur, Radiocarbon It is not unusual to 14C-date such a low amount of collagen, provided other bone fractions are tested.
The good dates are confirmed using at least two different methods, ideally involving multiple independent labs for each method to cross-check results. Sometimes only one method is possible, reducing the confidence researchers have in the results. Kidding aside, dating a find is crucial for understanding its significance and relation to other fossils or artifacts. Methods fall into one of two categories: relative or absolute. Before more precise absolute dating tools were possible, researchers used a variety of comparative approaches called relative dating.
Radiocarbon dating can easily establish that humans have been on the earth for over twenty thousand years, at least twice as long as creationists are willing to allow. Therefore it should come as no surprise that creationists at the Institute for Creation Research ICR have been trying desperately to discredit this method for years. They have their work cut out for them, however, because radiocarbon C dating is one of the most reliable of all the radiometric dating methods. This article will answer several of the most common creationist attacks on carbon dating, using the question-answer format that has proved so useful to lecturers and debaters.
Answer: Cosmic rays in the upper atmosphere are constantly converting the isotope nitrogen N into carbon C or radiocarbon.
Carbondated dinosaur bones, non permineralized fossils, and soft tissue like proteins are evidence for young fossils.
Don’t expect intellectual honesty from a theist. Dogma by definition won’t allow it. William Lane Craig even said that if he was taken back in a time machine and saw for himself that Jesus did not resurrect, he would still believe that it happened anyway. That feeling in his heart trumps empirical evidence apparently. Mark Armitage published a peer reviewed paper documenting soft tissue in a triceratops horn. The resultant age 33, years before present. Evidently you didn’t bother to read the article you are commenting on, since that claim is dealt with in it.
It is not suppressed or ignored but is often referred to as an example of a creationist fraud. Do you know who lied to you and told it was published in a peer-reviewed journal, or did you just make that bit up? Firstly, a fossil does not contain soft tissue. If might contain fossilised formerly soft tissue such as skin or tendons but that is not the same as soft tissue.
A Triceratops brow horn discovered in Dawson County, Montana, has been controversially dated to around 33, years, challenging the view that dinosaurs died out around 65 million years ago. The finding radically suggests that early humans may have once walked the earth with the fearsome reptiles thousands of years ago. The Museum, which has been in cooperation since with the Paleochronology Group, a team of consultants in geology, paleontology, chemistry, engineering, and education, sent a sample of the outer portion of the Triceratops brow horn to Head of the Paleochronology Group Hugh Miller, at his request, in order to carry out Carbon dating.
Miller told Ancient Origins that it is always desirable to carbon date several fractions to minimize the possibility of errors, which Miller requested, and that essential concordance was achieved in the ‘s of years as with all bone fractions of ten other dinosaurs.
Radioactive dating is a method of dating rocks and minerals using radioactive isotopes. This method is useful for igneous and metamorphic rocks, which cannot be dated by the stratigraphic correlation method used for sedimentary rocks. Over naturally-occurring isotopes are known. Some do not change with time and form stable isotopes i. The unstable or more commonly known radioactive isotopes break down by radioactive decay into other isotopes.
Radioactive decay is a natural process and comes from the atomic nucleus becoming unstable and releasing bits and pieces. These are released as radioactive particles there are many types.
To know if carbon dating is accurate, we would have to know how much carbon was in the atmosphere in the beginning, and also how long it has been increasing, or decreasing. Since no one was there, no one knows for sure. It’s like trying to figure out how long a candle has been burning, without knowing the rate at which it burns, or its original size. Living penguins have been carbon dated and the results said that they had died 8, years ago!
This is just one of many inaccurate dates given by Carbon dating.
Carbon dating dinosaurs. C decay to radiocarbon date m. Arlotta p 1, years, may be very young. While people, years old. Radiation from presumably.
Finding measurable C14 in the bones would therefore invalidate the consensus belief that dinosaurs lived and died over 65 million years ago. Secular paleontologists consider it a waste of time to test for C14 in dinosaur bone. But if you do, you never know. In the spring issue of their peer-reviewed CRS Quarterly , they published a special report with results of their iDINO project : an investigation into soft tissue remains in dinosaur bones.
This issue was prepared and printed before the announcement in Nature Communications. The bombshell announcement is that measurable C14 has been found in dinosaur bones. Brian Thomas and Vance Nelson report:. Measurable amounts of radiocarbon have been consistently detected within carbonaceous materials across Phanerozoic strata. Under uniformitarian assumptions , these should no longer contain measurable amounts of radiocarbon.
Secularists have asserted that these challenging finds originate from systematic contamination , but the hypothesis of endogenous radiocarbon should be considered. Consistent with this hypothesis, we report detectable amounts of radiocarbon in all 16 of our samples. Attempts to falsify our hypothesis failed, including a comparison of our data with previously published carbon-dated fossils. We conclude that fossils and other carbonaceous materials found throughout Phanerozoic strata contain measurable amounts of radiocarbon that is most probably endogenous.
Thomas and Nelson began by predicting radiocarbon in dinosaur bone based on long-standing published reports of measurable radiocarbon in coal, diamonds, and other materials assumed by evolutionary geologists to be millions of years old.
Email address:. Carbon is a radiometric dating method useful for paleontologists researching dinosaurs. What types of rock can be dated using the radiometric dating method Examples of dating. Relative dating won’t work on. Many do we review applications of a typical. An article by.
God is perfect and man isn’t, so it would be better to trust God over man. And how do you debunk carbon dating? Carbon can only give an age.
We know that carbon 14 dating is totally irrelevant to the theory of evolution. Ignorant evolutionists, however, think carbon 14 dating proves evolution, and continue to make that claim. Comedian Lewis Black, who by no stretch of the imagination is a knowledgeable evolutionist, argues,. We have the facts in carbon dating and fossils. Perhaps we should not even dignify this with a response, but we do get emails from evolutionists asserting that carbon dating proves evolution.
There must be many ignorant evolutionists out there. This essay is primarily selfish because it will save us time in the future. Carbon 14 is a radioactive element with a half-life of years. This means that half of the carbon 14 will decay in years. By 50, years, it will be almost completely gone, as shown in this diagram by Thomas Higham.